questions about srctool
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:57 am
Hello everyone,
I am extracting the spectra of some diffuse emission from a large area (e.g. 4 deg×2deg) and I am a bit confused about some parameters automatically derived by the *srctool* method.
1)I find that the photon counts given by the *srctool* are less than the value which I directly count. The question is how *srctool* calculate the GTI and where to find the GTI information?
B.T.W. It seems that *srctool* cannot correctly calculate the exposure? For my region, the EXPOSURE keyword in derived spectrum file is about 2000 s but the exposure map shows that the exposure in any point is about 100 s. I guess that it may relate to the calculation of exposure from GTI. The GTI generated by *srctool* may describe photons in the total region but actually these photons are not observed simultaneously.
2) Also I am confused by the BACKSCAL keyword. As I know, this keyword describes the relative area of spectrum-extracting region. But when I use a 5' circular source region and a 10'-15' annulus background region, in the source spectrum, the REGAREA is ~ 0.02 deg^2 which matches the absolute area. So the BACKSCAL is ~ 0.015 which is relative to the corresponding area of CCD size? But the REGAREA and BACKSCAL of the background spectrum is only 0.0037 and 0.0026. It seems that the description on the eRASS task website "intersection of the source region with the detector during the source-specific GTI" cannot fully explain this. Since the small BACKSCAL value will lead to a background-dominated source spectra, which seems not the case here.
Also I want to estimate the contribution from instrumental background. So I generate a spectrum file using the information provided by FWC data. Should I modify the BACKSCAL parameters here?
3) Will the *exttype* parameter in *srctool* affect the results? I guess that this parametes will control the weight of each point in my region to calculate the mean exposure and then ARF. Is there any other differences may bring by the change of *exttype*?
It seems that the description about those questions above may be too brief for me to understand it. I hope there can be a more detailed description about the calculation of parameters like BACKSCAL, GTI, EXPOSURE ... in the future.
Many thanks.
Ziqian Hua
I am extracting the spectra of some diffuse emission from a large area (e.g. 4 deg×2deg) and I am a bit confused about some parameters automatically derived by the *srctool* method.
1)I find that the photon counts given by the *srctool* are less than the value which I directly count. The question is how *srctool* calculate the GTI and where to find the GTI information?
B.T.W. It seems that *srctool* cannot correctly calculate the exposure? For my region, the EXPOSURE keyword in derived spectrum file is about 2000 s but the exposure map shows that the exposure in any point is about 100 s. I guess that it may relate to the calculation of exposure from GTI. The GTI generated by *srctool* may describe photons in the total region but actually these photons are not observed simultaneously.
2) Also I am confused by the BACKSCAL keyword. As I know, this keyword describes the relative area of spectrum-extracting region. But when I use a 5' circular source region and a 10'-15' annulus background region, in the source spectrum, the REGAREA is ~ 0.02 deg^2 which matches the absolute area. So the BACKSCAL is ~ 0.015 which is relative to the corresponding area of CCD size? But the REGAREA and BACKSCAL of the background spectrum is only 0.0037 and 0.0026. It seems that the description on the eRASS task website "intersection of the source region with the detector during the source-specific GTI" cannot fully explain this. Since the small BACKSCAL value will lead to a background-dominated source spectra, which seems not the case here.
Also I want to estimate the contribution from instrumental background. So I generate a spectrum file using the information provided by FWC data. Should I modify the BACKSCAL parameters here?
3) Will the *exttype* parameter in *srctool* affect the results? I guess that this parametes will control the weight of each point in my region to calculate the mean exposure and then ARF. Is there any other differences may bring by the change of *exttype*?
It seems that the description about those questions above may be too brief for me to understand it. I hope there can be a more detailed description about the calculation of parameters like BACKSCAL, GTI, EXPOSURE ... in the future.
Many thanks.
Ziqian Hua